Since Ahmed Al-Sharaa took office as head of Syria’s interim government in early 2025, the Arab world has been reassessing its long-frozen relationship with Damascus. After more than a decade of isolation, the region is once again opening its diplomatic doors – cautiously. For some, this represents Syria’s gradual return to its Arab fold; for others, it marks a pragmatic and symbolic engagement driven by shifting regional interests and guarded expectations.
According to international relations researcher Mohammed al-Yemeni, speaking to +963, “The period between 2023 and 2025 witnessed a delicate diplomatic recalibration and changing regional calculations toward Syria.” He notes that Syria’s reinstatement to the Arab League in 2023 was a “real test” for Gulf capitals exploring whether Damascus could be reintegrated into the Arab system after years of rupture.
Saudi Arabia played a central role in pushing for Syria’s return under its policy of “containment through engagement,” while the UAE advanced through economic outreach. Qatar, however, maintained a conditional stance tied to political reform, and Kuwait opted for a wait-and-see approach.
Read also: Why Peace with Israel No Longer Scares Arabs
Early Overtures: Gulf Reconnection after a Decade of Silence
Following Al-Sharaa’s rise to power, signs of renewed contact between Syria and Gulf states emerged quickly, particularly with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain.
In February 2025, Al-Sharaa visited Riyadh – the first symbolic Gulf endorsement of Syria’s transitional phase. Saudi Arabia emphasised unity and stability, the UAE pledged reconstruction support, and Bahrain backed state-building efforts. The rapprochement culminated with a GCC summit in Mecca and a follow-up visit to Abu Dhabi in July, alongside the gradual reopening of embassies.
However, momentum slowed by mid-2025 as political reforms in Damascus stalled, Western sanctions persisted, and regional crises such as the Gaza war diverted attention.
Saudi Arabia: Containment, Not Embrace
Riyadh welcomed the transitional government and reiterated its support for Syria’s unity. In an August 2025 statement, Saudi Arabia called for protecting national sovereignty and avoiding foreign interference, framing Syrian stability as a cornerstone of Arab security.
Al-Yemeni emphasises that Saudi engagement is pragmatic rather than ideological: “Any advanced partnership depends on Damascus’s ability to rein in armed factions, limit Iranian influence, and preserve institutional unity.”
Geostrategic analyst Ibrahim Kaban told +963 that “Gulf support for Damascus is driven by shared strategic interests, not ideological alignment.” He describes current ties as “transactional and conditional,” shaped by regional power balances rather than deep political trust.
UAE: Political Backing with Security Reservations
The UAE has shown open political support but remains cautious. Experts note that Abu Dhabi prefers controlled stability over unpredictable change and conditions its economic partnerships on administrative reforms and anti-corruption measures.
“The UAE is acting carefully,” says Kaban, “while competition among Gulf states –notably Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE – for influence in post-war Syria remains a strategic factor.” Bahrain, meanwhile, has taken a more openly supportive stance, highlighting reconciliation and dialogue. Manama hosted al-Sharaa in May 2025, reaffirming its commitment to backing the Syrian people in rebuilding state institutions.
Arab Outreach Beyond the Gulf: Cairo, Amman, Baghdad, and Beirut Step In
The renewed engagement has extended beyond the Gulf to include Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon. These countries see Damascus’s transition as a cautious step toward stability despite ongoing challenges.
Cairo has focused on counter-terrorism and limiting external influence; Amman has prioritised border security and refugee management; Baghdad has sought coordinated security control; and Lebanon views cooperation with Damascus as a potential economic lifeline.
Yet, as Kaban notes, “Most Arab states are still waiting to see the direction of Gulf policy before committing to full normalisation.”
Read also: Moscow and Damascus: From Painful Past to Pragmatic Diplomacy
North African Watchfulness
North African states have responded with restraint. Morocco has opened cautious communications but stopped short of reopening its embassy. Algeria has maintained its long-held stance supporting non-interference and political solutions, while Tunisia remains concerned about returning fighters from Syria, conditioning engagement on resolving that issue.
Shared Security Concerns Dominate
Across the Arab world, concerns over armed groups, cross-border smuggling, and humanitarian instability persist. Professor Hassan Abdullah al-Da’ja told +963 that “security files such as weapons trafficking, drug networks, and militia activity shape the very foundation of Arab-Syrian relations.”
The relationship, he adds, “is complex and driven as much by security priorities as by political and economic considerations.
Conditional Support and Slow Normalisation
Arab and Gulf governments have defined clear conditions for engagement with Damascus: disbanding militias outside state control, respecting borders and sovereignty, ensuring transparency in reconstruction funds, advancing inclusive political reform, and combating corruption.
“The Gulf approach is about managing influence, not forming a solid alliance,” says al-Yemeni, while al-Daj’a cautions that “it is still too early to speak of a full-fledged partnership. What we are witnessing is a cautious start built on security coordination and mutual testing.”
Between Old Promises and New Realities
The initial optimism of early 2025 has since given way to measured caution amid the Gaza conflict, rising Turkish–Iranian tensions, and Syria’s slow pace of reform. Yet dialogue continues; restrained but consistent.
As Kaban summarises, “Syria is no longer isolated, but it is not fully embraced either.” For Arab and Gulf capitals, Damascus represents both a potential partner in regional stabilisation and a political gamble still under evaluation.
By October 2025, relations remain defined by symbolic diplomacy, conditional support, and strategic patience – a balancing act between hope for normalisation and the reality of enduring mistrust.
