In a long-awaited step, Lebanon and Syria have placed their preliminary agreement on border demarcation on the table, marking the beginning of a new chapter in their historical relationship. The meeting between the Lebanese and Syrian defense ministers in Jeddah, directly mediated by Saudi Arabia, resulted in an agreement that has long been considered one of the most complex political and security issues in the region. While optimism surrounds this development, the road to implementation remains fraught with obstacles that could hinder its success.
For years, tensions along the 375-kilometer border between Syria and Lebanon have persisted, particularly in sensitive areas. These borders, which have never been precisely demarcated since both countries gained independence from the French mandate, have remained a source of political and security conflicts. The roots of the issue trace back to the 1920s under the French mandate when international powers divided the region into administrative entities without clearly defining their borders. This ongoing ambiguity has fueled tensions, especially amid the shifting geopolitical landscape in the region.
The agreement, signed on Thursday, March 27, by Syrian Defense Minister Major General Eng. Marhaf Abu Qasra and Lebanese Defense Minister Major General Michel Menassa, brings a new dimension to bilateral relations. The urgent need to formalize border demarcation stems from escalating smuggling activities, armed clashes between rival factions, and acts of sabotage across the border. In recent years, this area has been plagued by arms and drug trafficking, along with the movement of armed groups exploiting the security vacuum. Thus, border demarcation is not just a geographic concern but a critical security and political issue requiring comprehensive solutions.
Read also: Lebanese Army Shuts Down Two Illegal Crossings with Syria
This time, with Saudi Arabia playing a prominent role as an international guarantor, the agreement takes on greater significance as a step toward regional stability. The deal was ratified in the presence of Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman, highlighting Riyadh’s substantial diplomatic efforts to mediate reconciliation between Damascus and Beirut. This role reinforces Saudi Arabia’s regional and international influence, positioning it as a key player in stabilizing the region. The Kingdom has strategic interests in supporting Syria’s stability and its emerging governance, while also limiting Hezbollah’s influence along the border. By curbing Hezbollah’s ability to generate revenue from smuggling operations, this agreement could bolster the sovereignty of the Lebanese state.
However, several challenges could impede the agreement’s implementation. The interwoven nature of border regions and their diverse demographics present a significant hurdle. Many Lebanese villages have Syrian residents and vice versa, meaning any border adjustments could lead to complex social conflicts. Additionally, disputes over strategic areas, such as the Shebaa Farms—where sovereignty remains contested between Lebanon, Syria, and Israel—continue to complicate the situation. Acknowledging Syrian ownership of Shebaa Farms would negate the notion of a permanent Israeli occupation of Lebanese territory, undermining Hezbollah’s justification for maintaining armed resistance.
Further obstacles stem from local stakeholders, including smuggling networks and Hezbollah, which holds substantial influence over certain border areas. Over the years, this porous border has evolved into a network of illegal crossings exploited by armed militias to expand their power, while Lebanese and Syrian authorities have struggled to establish effective coordination. Hezbollah is unlikely to be pleased with this preliminary agreement and the subsequent negotiations, as it directly threatens its extensive cross-border operations.
Read also: Lebanon Prepares to Extradite 700 Syrian Prisoners
Despite these complexities, this agreement could serve as an opportunity to transform these challenges into solutions. The participation of both governments at the negotiating table, coupled with Saudi backing, signals the potential for a relationship based on mutual respect and national sovereignty. This development could pave the way for broader cooperation between Lebanon and Syria, whether in politics or economics, especially if they successfully address the obstacles to its implementation.
Ultimately, border demarcation between Lebanon and Syria is a crucial test of both nations’ commitment to security and stability. It also presents a chance to strengthen ties between two countries deeply affected by each other’s affairs. If successfully executed, this agreement could have a significant positive impact on regional stability, provided that all parties involved demonstrate genuine commitment to achieving tangible and effective results.
